posted on Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:19 PM by Endie

Hezbollah and Israel

The media are notably bad at assessing how military campaigns are progressing.  Everyone will, I am sure, remember the prognostications of doom from CNN and the BBC (less so from Sky, whose coverage was more balanced) during the liberation of Iraq, when we were told that the offensive was stalled and that Baghdad would be the West's Stalingrad, inflicting tens of thousands of casualties upon the struggling infidels as the Fehdayeen and elite Republican Guard fought house to house.

So when the media says that Israel's military is rocked by the fierce resistance they are meeting from Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, it is worth asking what the strategic aims of Israel are.

Israel's goals are not territorial aggrandisement.  They don't want a bunch of fly-blown villages and rebellious donkey-powered farmers.

Nor do they particularly want a strip of demilitarised land in Southern Lebanon, whether that is patrolled by themselves, te Lebanese or the UN.  They will accept such a measure, but it is a tool, not an aim.  Particularly given the fact that a 20-mile-wide strip would not prevent the use of 70-mile-range rockets.

What they want is the neutralisation of Hezbollah.  Luckily, that is what the USA, the UK, the Saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians, Iraquis, Turks and every other non-terrorist state in the region wants.  Only Syria and Iran - who almost certainly made the mistake of provoking this conflict using their Hezbollah stooges, in order to divert focus from their nuclear program, which a few weeks ago was beginning to come under extreme focus - wish otherwise.  Iran wanted, probably, to offer a ceasefire from Hezbollah in return for concessions over the nuclear issue.

And why is this relevant to whether things are going well for Israel?

Well, the nightmare scenario for Israel would have been Hezbollah melting away ahead of them.  They are an irregular force, and Israel could have expended much money and international opinion shelling empty buildings and levelling villages to no avail had Hezbollah simply retreated ahead of them.  This is what the Vietnamese did after they worked out that irregular non-Western troops cannot fight a Western army, and it worked.  Leave your superior opponent punching at air and connecting with civilians, all the time declaring your love of peace and sympathy for those suffering around you, and you have the makings of a successful terrorist force.  Lenin would have told them that, amd he would have told them, also, that trying to pick stand-up fights was reckless egoism that a revolutionary cannot afford.

So the Israelis must be delighted that they are getting a chance to do what they came to achieve: Hezbollah fighters are apparently standing and fighting, which doubtless means that they are dying in large numbers.  If they become too few, the problem will not be the Israelis - the moderate Arab world can only give Israel so long to do their dirty work for them against the Islamists - but rather the host country, who may despise the Israelis, but will also undoubtely know who brought the storm down upon them.

Comments

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:34 PM by MightyCornholio
Dilbert creator Scott Adams echoes similar thoughts regarding the future or the Arab world on his blog: http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2006/07/whats_your_theo_1.html

You are in good company

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Monday, July 31, 2006 3:36 PM by the hippo
only my opinion, but I suspect there is a nasty undercurrent of anti-semitism creeping into the British media (and those wankers who were protesting about "Israeli terrorism" at Prestwick's)psyche. I ain't fooled by the "poor innocent old moslems" pish.......

Hezbollah know exactly what they're doing, and again, only in my opinion, but for historical AND current reasons, Israel needs to take a hawk-like stance on this.

Flame away........

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:41 AM by Endie
Nah, you're quite right: the hard left in Britain has traditionally harboured an undercurrent of anti-semitism (except when Soviet policy dictated otherwise), and that is particularly noticeable now that a campaign of entryism has given the Socialist Workers' Party effective control over the Stop The War movement, along with their front party (Gorgeous George's "Respect") and CND (who now back Iran's nuclear program as a somewhat paradoxical result). The result of this witch's brew of revolutionary socialism and islamo-fascism has been an increasing profile in the media of strongly anti-Israeli views. These are dressed up as "anti-Zionism", but since they support Hezbollah's existential approach to Israel - ie it shouldn't exist and the Jews should be removed from the Middle East - it boils down to good old anti-semitism, just without the blood libel.

A good place for comment on this sort of stuff is the Drink-Soaked Trotskyite Popinjays for War blog, in the sidebar.

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:53 PM by MightyCornholio
And who'd have believed that Mr Mel "Martin Riggs" Gibson would be in support of such an action, as he stated during his arrest, "The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world." I'm just gald his planned Holocaust TV mini-series has now been canned, the man is obviously ill-equipped to put his disgusting beliefs aside to be impartial. The Passion of the Christ's refusal to paint the Romans as culpable in the crucifiction was a sad slight on his part.

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Wednesday, August 02, 2006 4:01 PM by Endie
Oh come on, if everything derogatory I had said when drunk was noted by police and publicised I'd have to apologise to an awful lot more people than Mel. Or even more than David Icke. I'd certainly never work in Englandshire again.

He's an alcoholic with a bad case of situational narcissistic disorder. I hope he'd cut me some slack were the positions reversed. I'm not a big fan of the saying "in vino veritas", except when appended by "and a whole lot of bullshit that sounds good at the tmie but is awfully embarassing afterwards too."

And the Romans hardly get away scot-free in the Passion of The Christ. The point is that it's not "The Jews" that force the crucifixion, nor "The Romans" that carry it out. It's just some Jews and some Romans. I'm not one for inherited guilt, myself.

Plus, Michael Jackson forgave the Jewish people for crucifying him. He did so at the Brit Awards in 1996 by shedding his black clothes, appearing in dazzling white, and kissing the head of a rabbi. So that's all in the past, now.

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:58 PM by MightyCornholio
Now Endie, comparing Michael Jackson to Jesus is cheap and unworthy of you.

A fairer comparison to the son of God would be Chuck Norris. When life has reached a crossroads for me, I often ask myself "What would Chuck Norris do?" I then smile, nod my head in self-recognition and think of him sending one of his miraculous roundhouse kicks to his enemies.

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:54 PM by the hippo
it's a well known fact that Chuck Norris "does not sleep - he waits" And if anybody tries to use an oil embargo against those who Chuck defends, just remember - "his chief export is pain" oh God, I LOVE Chuck Norris.......

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Friday, August 04, 2006 12:20 PM by MightyCornholio
Perhaps if Chuck knew how strongly you feel about him he may shed a tear and then we'd have a cure for cancer?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAc1G3u-hxs

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Friday, August 04, 2006 12:23 PM by MightyCornholio

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Friday, August 04, 2006 12:36 PM by the hippo
I really, really hope and pray that you recognised the monstrous dosages of irony in my pro-Norris comments........

# re: Hezbollah and Israel

Friday, August 04, 2006 12:47 PM by Endie
MC Said:

"When life has reached a crossroads for me, I often ask myself 'What would Chuck Norris do?'"

I'll tell you what he'd do: he'd kill your ass for taking his name in vain.